Search for: "State v. E. M. P."
Results 41 - 60
of 1,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Ct. for the E. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987). [14] United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Other nonimmigrant categories allow for quasi dual intent such as the O, E-1, E-2, and P categories. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Diese Konvention ist ein zentrales Instrument des Völkerrechts, um das "nie wieder" umzusetzen. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The Queen, [1971] S.C.R. 738, at p. 740). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
M. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Robert P. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
It is worth considering if only because it represents, in a general way, much of the thinking that is gaining increasing traction not just among developing states, but also among a certain sector of academic and policy elites in liberal democratic developed states. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
The Court has turned away each such challenge (most recently in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
