Search for: "State v. E. N. W."
Results 41 - 60
of 1,696
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
§ 2383, which provides that “[w]hoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto … shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
And since we are in San Diego and I am a former California state securities regulator, let me throw in one more — Regulation CE, a Commission exemption for transactions exempt from qualification under Section 25102(n) of the California Corporations Code.[9] Each exemption differs on particular factors, such as whether general solicitation is permitted, the types of issuers that can use the exemption, the types of investors that can purchase under the exemption, the amount of… [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm
” State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
" On the day that the Court's decision dropped, the President sent another letter lamenting the "difficult day" that "[w]e" "see" "as a step backwards. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
State Coll. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 3:43 am
Inter-American Court of Human RightsMembers and Militants of Unión Patriótica v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm
”[16] However, the experience of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) should serve as a cautionary tale. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:10 am
Spain, Sanchez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
Thomas warned that “[w]e should not sacrifice constitutional protections for the sake of convenience. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
See generally Daryl E. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Christiani,*Richard W. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Incidentally, one should note that with the exception of an additional point (a), the requirements in Article 8(8) points (b) to (e) mirror the article 3(9) of the AD Regulation. [read post]
