Search for: "State v. Eady"
Results 41 - 60
of 285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
In Lait v Evening Standard Limited [2010] EWHC 3239 (QB), a case concerned with the parliamentary expenses scandal, Eady J had to consider capable meanings. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
The Court of Appeal’s scepticism of as to Eady J’s approach (determining imputations of fact on the basis of verifiability) has, moreover, been queried by the Supreme Court in Joseph v Spiller [114]. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
There was also a costs hearing in the case of Decker v Hopcraft before Sir David Eady. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:52 am
In Lockton v Persons Unknown and Google Inc [2009] EWHC 3423 (QB). the court questioned whether it had jurisdiction to make an order against a company based in the United States without a place of business in England. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm
Sir David Eady rejected the application ([2014] EWHC 4104 (QB)). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
On 29 June 2017 Sir David Eady heard an appeal in the slander case of Otu v Morley and decided that the Master had not made a final determination on the defendant’s summary judgment application. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
On 5 April 2016 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd, (heard 23 March 2017) Events 28 April 2017, “Conference on Freedom of Expression Online,” Nicosia, Filoxenia Conference Centre, Cyprus Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Defteros v Google Inc & Anor [2017] VSC 158 John Dixon J granted summary judgment to Google Australia (Pty) Ltd in a defamation claim. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
This decision was the subject of a number of reports including in the Press Gazette and the Independent On 30 March 2017 Sir David Eady handed down judgment on the damages assessment case of Harrath v Stand for Peace [2017] EWHC 653 (QB). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
The House of Lords loses the plot The first seismic change in the law of defamation as it applies to the media occurred in 1999 in the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
” Alex Spence at Buzzfeed has uncovered the fact that the Telegraph hired Sir David Eady, who they described as “the judge who stops us from knowing the truth,” to conduct a secret internal inquiry. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm
Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd [2016] EWHC 3110 (QB) (Sir David Eady) – the claimant succeeded and recovered damages of £185,000. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
On 14 December 2016, Sir David Eady made an order under section 12 of the Defamation Act 2013 – requiring the defendant to publish a summary of his judgment in the case of Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 3110 (QB). [read post]
