Search for: "State v. Ege" Results 41 - 60 of 429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:42 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0145p.06 2007/04/24 Ege v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:18 am by Giles Peaker
(our report here) states in no uncertain terms that the common law position is that a landlord’s notice to quit is irrevocable once served.30. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
It confirms that in principle a design court in a EU Member State has jurisdiction to consider remedies, including damages, also in relation to infringing activities occurred outside the territory where the court seised has its seat. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
" [para 186]There is no need to recall that the way Member States have transposed this provision into their own copyright laws varies, with some Member Stateseg the UK, deciding initially not to take full advantage of the scope of this exception. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:00 pm
"Earlier this week, the Kat received an email from Chief Master Marsh in the Chancery Division who stated that all was not to be feared. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
However, despite subsequent Chamber judgments to similar effect (see, eg, Österreichische Vereinigung v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the US Department of State Human Rights Report for Uganda cites examples to unlawful killings and torture, and other abuses of detainees and suspects. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
 The claimant relied on the presumption that foreign law is the same as that in England (see eg. [read post]