Search for: "State v. Eure"
Results 41 - 60
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2007, 2:57 pm
The second pillar is common foreign and security policy, which comes under Title V of the EU Treaty. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:53 am
Belgium and Belcacemi and Oussar v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
Unlawful State aid is null and void. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:36 pm
Z o.o v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
The Court set costs at the upper ceiling of 200,000 EUR as the amount in dispute was set at 1,500,000 EUR (as per Art. 1 of the decision of the Administrative Committee of 24 April 2023 on the table of upper limits for reimbursable costs – see here). [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
However, there was no breach of Article 13 as regards the civil proceedings as the Applicants had an effective remedy, albeit the outcome was unfavourable to them.In terms of just satisfaction, the Court’s award ranged from EUR 10000 to EUR 20000 for non-pecuniary damage and various amounts were awarded for pecuniary loss.This case usefully adds a potential ECHR ground to any claim brought against a public body under the Rylands v Fletcher rule. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm
Gill v Anagnost, Crews and Grenier (United States) A libel action brought in the New Hampshire state court concerning the posting of defamatory statements on a billboard by mortgage broker Michael Gill. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Eur. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Eur. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 8:41 pm
On 14 November 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Armin Maletic and Marianne Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH and TUI Österreich GmbH. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 9:02 am
If that was not enough, the damages awarded by the ECtHR were also significantly lower than what Safarov had requested: EUR 5,000 vs over EUR 128,000. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm
It reiterated that those in political positions had to display greater tolerance, Lopes Gomes Da Silva v Portugal (2002) 34 EHRR 56 and Artun and Güvener v Turkey no. 15510/01 considered. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:25 am
How many times as the Article 7 sui generis right infringement resulted in EUR 5 million fine? [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:24 am
The lawyers acting for Telenet had charged over 185,000 EUR and the patent attorney more than 44,000 EUR. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Michigan cases dealing with business corporations confirm the state’s continuing commitment to Dodge. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:18 pm
In the case of A.K. v. [read post]
