Search for: "State v. Franc" Results 41 - 60 of 3,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2008, 2:18 pm
The Court of Justice handed down an important judgment in Case C-164/07 James Wood v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Courdec and Hachette Filipacchi v France the privacy rights of another member of Monaco’s ruling family were outweighed by the interests of the press: French court order found to have breached Paris-Match’s Article 10 by Strasbourg. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:09 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [France][Petition granted][ Consent and Grave risk of harm not established] Peyre v McGary, 2023 WL 3726728. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:23 am by Joel R. Brandes
”, born in the United States in 2004, from his habitual residence in France, and that such wrongful retention occurred on or about June 30, 2016. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Hadir v Vazquez, 2019 WL 5061068 (District of Columbia, 2019) the district court granted the Petition of Sami Abou-Haidar, who resided in Paris, France, for the return of the party’s daughter to France. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRANCE(Application no. 43835/11)JUDGMENTSTRASBOURG1 July 2014This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of S.A.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am by INFORRM
So Google clearly has leverage, but so do nation-states and France, for one, is not loath to use the tools at its disposal, among them competition law. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Sanchez v France [2021] ECHR 724 (available only in French) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that the conviction of a politician for failing to promptly delete unlawful comments published by third parties on the public wall of his Facebook account did not breach his Article 10 rights despite his apparent lack of knowledge of the comments. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:31 pm
Supreme Court some years to establish its authority over state courts with respect to federal law, a feat accomplished in 1816 in Martin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by INFORRM
On 15 May 2023 in the case of Sanchez v France, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) confirmed its earlier Chamber judgment of 2 September 2021 (see Inforrm post here). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 2:40 pm
"  I once went to a performance of "Henry V" at the Globe Theatre in London. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:46 pm
I know I’m missing some folks, but at a minimum we had trademark law bloggers and readers from France, Spain, England, China, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Germany, Canada, Finland, Switzerland, South Africa, the Netherlands, and many cities throughout the United States. [read post]