Search for: "State v. Franc" Results 41 - 60 of 2,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am by INFORRM
So Google clearly has leverage, but so do nation-states and France, for one, is not loath to use the tools at its disposal, among them competition law. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Sanchez v France [2021] ECHR 724 (available only in French) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that the conviction of a politician for failing to promptly delete unlawful comments published by third parties on the public wall of his Facebook account did not breach his Article 10 rights despite his apparent lack of knowledge of the comments. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or… [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:31 pm
Supreme Court some years to establish its authority over state courts with respect to federal law, a feat accomplished in 1816 in Martin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by INFORRM
On 15 May 2023 in the case of Sanchez v France, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) confirmed its earlier Chamber judgment of 2 September 2021 (see Inforrm post here). [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 2:40 pm
"  I once went to a performance of "Henry V" at the Globe Theatre in London. [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
In proposing the bill, the government stated its wish to protect the freedom of abortion after the landmark decision of Roe v. [read post]