Search for: "State v. Fusco"
Results 41 - 45
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Industries brought an action before the Court of First Instance, which held that the Board of Appeal had wrongly stated that the marks at issue were clearly distinct. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:14 am
However, the complaint failed to comply with CPLR 3016(a), which requires that a complaint sounding in defamation "set forth the particular words complained of'" (Simpson v Cook Pony Farm Real Estate, Inc., 12 AD3d 496, 497, quoting CPLR 3016[a]; see Fusco v Fusco, 36 AD3d 589). [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:17 am
Div., 2nd Dept.1998] ). 'The relationship of such shareholders is a fiduciary one.' Fusco, 2005 WL 3372976, at *2 (citing Brunetti v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:57 pm
Fusco, 748 F.2d 996, 998 (5th Cir. 1984). [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Fusco, Jr. v. [read post]
