Search for: "State v. Gaye"
Results 41 - 48
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm
The lead attorney on the cases, Richard Busch, was notably the lead attorney for the Marvin Gaye family in their suit against Pharrell and Robin Thicke for the ‘Blurred Lines’ infringement. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
Related articles Celebrity Legacies: Blurred Lines Surround Marvin Gaye Estate "Was He A Hero? [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm
In response to the comments, SESAC has stated that it “wholeheartedly supports the goals of the Music Modernization Act and wants those goals made law — just like you do. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Solis v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
While Sheeran attempted to convince a New York jury that he didn’t infringe Marvin Gaye’s classic “Let’s Get It On,” Universal Music Group (UMG) was trying to convince nervous investors that it’s ready to take on the fast-moving wave of AI-generated music that threatens to upend the music industry as we know it. [read post]
