Search for: "State v. Goldfarb" Results 41 - 60 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At LAWnLingistics, Neal Goldfarb notes that Lucia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 11:07 pm
Co. v Goldfarb (53 NY2d at 401), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the proposition that where an insurer may face liability based upon some of the grounds for recovery asserted but not upon others, the insured defendant is entitled to be represented by an attorney of his or her own choosing at the expense of the insurer (see Prashker v United States Guar. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Conor McEvily
This blog’s online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm by SOIssues
For the state: Robert Goldfarb, of counsel to the Attorney General's office. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
” At LAWnLinguistics, Neal Goldfarb previews Lockhart v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am by Richard Hunt
May 16, 2018) the court rejected a motion to dismiss claiming that pleadings “on information and belief” were not sufficient to state a claim. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Ginsburg Tapes (podcast), Lauren Moxley analyzes Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1976 oral argument in Califano v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
Generally, the SEC sends a written notice to the RIA stating that it will arrive at the RIA’s principal place of business on a certain date and, in order to facilitate the examination, will request a list of information to be provided to the staff prior to the examination. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:14 am by Pamela S. Karlan
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:22 pm by Jarod Bona
Of course, the Virginia State Bar in Goldfarb was capable of conspiring to violate the antitrust laws and was not protected by state-action immunity. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]