Search for: "State v. Gratz"
Results 41 - 60
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
In contrast, on that same day in a 6-3 decision, the Court held that the university’s undergraduate admissions policy, which automatically awarded points to applicants from certain racial minority groups, violated the Equal Protection Clause (Gratz v Bollinger). [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
Two Michigan cases in 2003, Gratz v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
In contrast, on that same day in a 6-3 decision, the Court held that the university’s undergraduate admissions policy, which automatically awarded points to applicants from certain racial minority groups, violated the Equal Protection Clause (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
For them, the opacity of holistic review is a virtue, because it allows administrators to engage in what is effectively racial balancing — a practice that the Supreme Court invalidated in Grutter’s companion case, Gratz v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
And we found law, undergrad, and med-school discrimination even at the University of Michigan (before voters banned it) – and indeed worse undergrad discrimination than there was in the system that the Supreme Court struck down in Gratz v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Nevertheless, relying on the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Gratz v Bollinger (84 EPD ¶41,416), the DC Circuit found that the plaintiff here suffered an actual or imminent injury as a result of the 1990-92 Plan. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [8] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
In contrast, on that same day in a 6-3 decision, the Court held that the university’s undergraduate admissions policy, which automatically awarded points to applicants from certain racial minority groups, violated the Equal Protection Clause (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:07 am
Viacom * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
(Gratz v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Conrad v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:45 pm
Stephen Breyer, who voted to strike down an affirmative action plan in Gratz v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
Arguing for the state of Michigan in Schuette v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
The case is a direct outgrowth of the Court’s 2003 decisions in Gratz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
Clancy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The "educational benefits of student body diversity," said the Supreme Court in Gratz v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The "educational benefits of student body diversity," said the Supreme Court in Gratz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:51 am
On June 24, in Fisher v. [read post]
