Search for: "State v. Groff"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
The court’s June 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
” Last week in Groff v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
First on the agenda is Quarles v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:40 am
While acknowledging that both lower courts and the EEOC had “accepted Hardison as prescribing a “‘more than a de minimis cost’” test,” in Groff v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am
Dailey v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
The most immediate impact comes from Groff v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
The issue is back once again in Groff v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 3:30 am
Corbett sharply and thoroughly excavates the problem from Supreme Court opinions like Groff v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am
At issue in Groff is whether to overrule TWA v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 2:31 pm
Groff v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
From Justice Alito's opinion in today's Groff v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 2:26 pm
The Supreme Court has clarified that employers must prove an accommodation would impose a substantial burden before denying it (Groff v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Jack Landman Goldsmith, Citizen of Heaven and Harvard: A Remembrance of Bill Stuntz, (April 02, 2025).Nicholas Reaves, Groff v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:08 am
In Groff v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:33 am
In Groff v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Groff v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
Another challenge to longstanding statutory precedent currently before the Court is Groff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:49 am
Supreme Court decision updated the federal religious accommodation test in Groff v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Vinson & Elkins Professor at the University of Houston Law Center, argued that courts need clearer guidance to adjudicate religious accommodation claims in the workplace following the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Groff v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
Ho praised the court for “restoring the text” of Title VII, likening it to the recent Supreme Court rulings in Groff v. [read post]
