Search for: "State v. Grounds" Results 41 - 60 of 40,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (AM)(Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An asylum-seeker's in-country appeal against removal on human rights grounds could not be stifled by the later issue of a certificate by the Secretary of State for the Home Department that the opposition was clearly unfounded. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:16 am by sally
Adedoyin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 773; [2010] WLR (D) 172 “Dishonesty or deception was required to render a false representation a ground for mandatory refusal of an application for extension of leave to remain. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:37 am
Room for caseworker’s discretion Ishtiaq v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A caseworker in the Home Office had a discretion to decide what evidence an applicant had to produce when she sought indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom on the ground that her matrimonial relationship had permanently broken down. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 2:44 am
Kindler [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a state procedural rule is not automatically "inadequate" to bar federal habeas review under the adequate state ground doctrine. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm by Sahana Rao
On April 15, 2020, the United States District Court for the District of Montana issued a decision in Northern Plains Resource Council v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:10 am
Regina (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Court of Justice of the European Communities “European member states could lawfully provide in their employment legislation for certain kinds of differences in treatment on the ground of age if those differences were objectively [...] [read post]
16 May 2005, 12:17 pm by DES
Heald, striking down (by a 5-4 majority) state laws that ban direct sales to consumers by out-of-state wineries while permitting direct sales by in-state wineries, on the ground that such laws violate the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]