Search for: "State v. Gutman"
Results 41 - 44
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Moreover, where "evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court must determine whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one" (Steve Elliot, LLC v Teplitsky, 59 AD3d 523, 524, citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275). [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:23 pm
Gutman v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
" (citing in footnote 57 to Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
It is relatively simple to state that there must be an acceptable relation between the legitimate destructive effect and undesirable collateral effects. [read post]