Search for: "State v. H. K. D. S." Results 41 - 60 of 714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Markus's blog where he has a Palm Beach Post story covering the career of the former Dade State and Federal prosecutor. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
Defendant may use demonstrative and documentary evidence, which the State may inspect and copy or photograph after paying reasonable expenses therefor: a) photographs c) video e) maps g) pharmacy records h) films d) diagrams f) medical/hospital h) weather records10. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Menaker, The Consequences of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration Alain Pellet, Police Powers or the States Right to Regulate Mark Feldman, Denial of Benefits after Plama v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
KAHN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 08-13435 ________________________ D. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:52 am by Kyle Persaud
Even if you qualify for an extension under the above conditions, you still may not apply to extend your visa if you were admitted to the U.S. under any of the following categories: • C (Alien in Transit) • D (Crewman) • K-1 or K-2 (Fiancé(e) or Dependent of Fiancé(e)) • S (Witness or Informant beyond a total of 3 years) • TWOV (Transit Without Visa) • WT or WB (Visa Waiver Program) How… [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:39 pm by Kurt R. Karst
D’Agostino v. ev3, Inc., 845 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016), was seen as a death knell for the fraud‑on-the-FDA theory in FCA cases. [read post]