Search for: "State v. Hansard"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
The Hansard report from 22 March is here. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
This is the basis for a long-running line of work by the UK’s Hansard Society, which is currently running a high-level Delegated Legislation Review. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 3:43 am
The RPT specifically stated that they “found no reason to limit the repayment orders to less than the full amount”.P appealed. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
Little over four years later the House of Lords handed down the oft-cited and widely commented upon judgment in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘A’) holding that the power was incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 3:43 am
The RPT specifically stated that they “found no reason to limit the repayment orders to less than the full amount”.P appealed. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
[4] Guerin v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:36 am
Hansard reported a debate on the Bill on 3 February 2023, in which Maria Caulfield (Conservative MP, Lewes) stated that: “There are concerns that the extension of protections against workplace harassment set out in the Bill, while entirely necessary, could inadvertently worsen the chilling effect on free speech in the workplace…” The government’s reasoning is that “employers may take unreasonable or drastic measures to avoid liability for… [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
A number of companies which own existing state of the art technology in this field are making their designs, drawings and instructions freely available and then well-known manufacturing companies are using parts and materials available in the UK supply chain to replicate the designs and increase the available production. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:29 pm
The Court in Grant v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
The three most recent full trials are Hughes v Risbridger (2010 EWHC 491 (QB)) Berezovsky v Russian Television (10 March 2010 EWHC 476 (QB)) and Gary Flood v Times Newspapers (16 October 2009 EWHC 2375 (QB)). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
