Search for: "State v. Hawkins-Stephens" Results 41 - 50 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt, the author of the panel decision, wrote a short concurring opinion joined by his colleague on the panel, Circuit Judge Michael Daly Hawkins. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am by Cyberleagle
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm by Ken
I've written about it here: anti-vax lawyer Clifford Shoemaker's legal harassment of Neurodiversity blogger Kathleen Seidel, the British Chiropractic Association's failed crusade against Simon Singh, naturopath Christopher Maloney's feckless SLAPP threat against blogger Michael Hawkins, and even Marc Stephens lawyer-posing against critics of the Burzynski Clinic. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
Stephen Kinsella, for example, makes the following claim in his book, Against Intellectual Property: Let us recall that IP rights give to pattern-creators partial rights of control—ownership—over the tangible property of everyone else. [read post]