Search for: "State v. Hendrix"
Results 41 - 60
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2024, 11:02 am
United States (24-291) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Hendrix v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm
Hendrix, Sup. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:45 pm
P'ship v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:05 pm
In 2019, the court ruled in Rehaif v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
Jimi Hendrix: Forty years ago Jimi Hendrix trilled his plaintive query: “Is this love, baby, or is it … [just] confusion? [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
Jimi Hendrix : Forty years ago Jimi Hendrix trilled his plaintive query: "Is this love, baby, or is it … [just] confusion? [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 10:12 am
After losing a battle in 2005 to have Jimi Hendrix’s right of publicity protected by New York state law, where Hendrix lived at his death, Hendrix’s heirs worked to amend the Washington state right of publicity law. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
(Midler v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 1:40 pm
Paxton’s claims in Texas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:57 pm
Genzyme Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
State) and Venis' case. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:17 am
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in Hendrix v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
State of Indiana (NFP) W.H. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:22 pm
This is in the Experience Hendrix, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:18 am
In the case of Hendrix v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:09 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Khan & Ors v R [2008] EWCA Crim 531 (14 March 2008) Burgess, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 516 (08 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Manchester City Council v Benjamin [2008] EWCA Civ 189 (13 March 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Experience Hendrix LLC & anor v Times Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 458 (Ch) (11 March 2008) Stow & Ors v Stow & Ors [2008] EWHC 495 (Ch) (14… [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:18 pm
Smith, 1995 WL 535012, 4 (5th Cir.1995); Hendrix v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am
The court’s decision in Jones v. [read post]