Search for: "State v. Hooper" Results 41 - 60 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, the Appellate Division noted that the language of the Employer's internal resolution was ambiguous, and opined that "This ambiguity itself precludes a finding of entitlement to contractual indemnification" as [1] the resolution does not convey a clear right to indemnification and [2] Plaintiff was ordered to pay restitution in connection with a guilty plea to disorderly conduct in satisfaction of an… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, the Appellate Division noted that the language of the Employer's internal resolution was ambiguous, and opined that "This ambiguity itself precludes a finding of entitlement to contractual indemnification" as [1] the resolution does not convey a clear right to indemnification and [2] Plaintiff was ordered to pay restitution in connection with a guilty plea to disorderly conduct in satisfaction of an… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, the Appellate Division noted that the language of the Employer's internal resolution was ambiguous, and opined that "This ambiguity itself precludes a finding of entitlement to contractual indemnification" as [1] the resolution does not convey a clear right to indemnification and [2] Plaintiff was ordered to pay restitution in connection with a guilty plea to disorderly conduct in satisfaction of an… [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:19 pm by WSLL
Strike, of Hooper-Strike Law Offices, LLC, Lander, WY. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Hooper, after the Supreme Court denied his final request for a stay. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Shital Prakash Kharat, Effect of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005 – Judicial Response, (February 6, 2017).Grant Robert Hooper, From the Magna Carta to Bentham to Modern Australian Judicial Review: Themes of Practicality and Spirituality, (Australian Institute of Administrative Law (AIAL) Forum, Vol. 84, pp. 22-44, 2016).From SSRN (LGBT Rights):Reva Siegel, Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash: Consensus, Conflict, and Constitutional Culture, (February 9, 2017).Susan Frelich… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:46 pm by Jimmy Verner
In 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Troxel v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:21 am
Hooper, of Hooper Law Offices, PC, Riverton, Wyoming; Tom A. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Justice Hooper adopted Mr Justice Baker’s reasoning as to why this was a special case. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
The Divisional Court thought so in Hooper v. [read post]