Search for: "State v. Howey" Results 41 - 60 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm by Jillian Moss
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Lee Reiners
Were it not for the “efforts of others” prong of the Howey Test, the majority of digital assets would qualify as investment contracts. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 5:30 am by Mark Astarita
Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946)The SEC has stated that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are not securities. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 12:40 pm by Ernest Badway
In particular, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission has used the four-part test first developed in the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in SEC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm by Christopher J. Hubbert
In addition, the SEC took the position that the BIAs are notes under the four-part test articulated in Reves v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
The most prominent case that’s applicable in the determination of whether an NFT is a security or an asset is SEC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:20 am by John Jascob
In each of these cases, the threshold issue is whether the digital asset or token is a security, a question that goes back to Congress’s definition of “security” in the 1930s, the Supreme Court’s Howey decision in the 1940s, and the Court’s Reves v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 2:36 pm by Sheila R. Carroll
  The SEC and its state counterparts presently apply the Howey[1]/Forman[2] tests set down by the U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:13 pm by Adam Levitin
Coinbase is the largest crypto exchange in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by John Jascob
Coinseed sold tokens in 2018 to raise money for a mobile app that allows users to round up everyday purchases made on their linked credit and debit cards and invest those round-ups in a choice of virtual currencies (SEC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by Daniel Nathan
An investment contract was defined by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]