Search for: "State v. Hoyt" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
" He calls it "perfectly clear" that, if the appropriate level of scrutiny for sex-based classifications were up for reconsideration, it should be "reduc[ed] … to rational-basis review" as in Hoyt v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
" He calls it "perfectly clear" that, if the appropriate level of scrutiny for sex-based classifications were up for reconsideration, it should be "reduc[ed] … to rational-basis review" as in Hoyt v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
” In the end, and by distinguishing from US v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
Second, the memo offers the narrow definition of "emolument," citing the corpus linguistics analysis published by James Phillips and Sarah White in the South Texas Law Review: Similarly, although the Emoluments Clauses prevent federal officers from accepting gifts or other "emolument" from foreign, federal or state governments or government officials,4 the Emoluments Clauses do not prohibit ordinary and customary private business transactions untethered to the… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm by John L. Welch
Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, 100 USPQ2d 1018 (TTAB 2011) [precedential]. [read post]