Search for: "State v. Hudson" Results 41 - 60 of 1,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
Under Central Hudson, a regulation must directly advance substantial government interest and be no more extensive than necessary to serve that interest. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:33 am by Shrivar Chendip
This blog was co-authored with: Jason Hudson, Candidate Attorney Platinum Property Enterprise (Pty) Ltd v Mcshane and Another The Western Cape High Court heard an application for an interdict and specific performance relating to the sale and transfer of immovable property. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am by Eric Goldman
The defendant is the Bye, Goff firm, based in River Falls, Wisconsin with other in-state offices. [read post]