Search for: "State v. J. D. C."
Results 41 - 60
of 3,190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am
The decision of Joanna Smith J. in Frain & McKinnon v Reeves & Curnock [2023] EWHC 73 (Ch) (at 19), was cited with approval, from which the following relevant principles could be distilled: a. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Em “A doutrina das semelhanças”, de 1933, Benjamin escreveu: “Sua percepção, em todos os casos, dá-se num relampejar. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
28; R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
J. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Over to Ada:"Before the starters, the chefs served hors d'oeuvres consisting of some outcomes from 2023. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm
J. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
But Judge J. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The United States considered this to be contrary to paragraph 3(c) of Section A of Canada’s TRQ Appendix (“Paragraph 3(c)”) which provides: Canada shall allocate its TRQs each quota year to eligible applicants. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
” 3 J. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
C. 20543,pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNo. 23–719DONALD J. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Joshua D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
