Search for: "State v. Jain"
Results 41 - 60
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2008, 12:31 am
Rranci v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
See Jain v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:47 am
On p. 186, I pointed out that “In March 1996, the doctrinal looseness of the “arbitrariness” test was most visibly highlighted by the Supreme Court of India in State of A.P. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:18 pm
Smith, 411 Mass 133 (1991) and Lyons v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:37 am
Besides the Chief Justice, the other judges on the Bench were Justices R V Raveendran, D K Jain, P Sathasivam and J M Panchal. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:17 pm
, 174 Ill.2d 77, 107 (1996); Jain v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Thanks to Eric White and V&E summer associate Varun Jain for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
29 May 2014, 11:32 pm
Inamdar v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
United States U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:15 pm
Sanjay Jain, an assistant professor of law. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:52 am
State Sugar Corporation Ltd v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
My FindLaw column, which will appear (here) later today, discusses the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 11:52 pm
Jain in the case of Iqbal Bano v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
The high court said a hearing officer at the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services improperly put Madhu Jain on the registry upon finding she acted negligently or carelessly.Bad Faith: DAMAGE CAUSED BY METH LAB ISN'T COVERED, OKLAHOMA FEDERAL JUDGE SAYS, State Farm v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am
So, scheme of the provision aims at keeping the supervisory role of the court at minimum level” (paragraph 18) [emphasis supplied].Public policy – fundamental policy of Indian law violated if damages for breach of contract claim automatically awarded without evidence being offeredAnila Gautam Jain v Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (Bombay High Court, 03 May 2018)Brief facts: Anila Gautam Jain (appellant) challenged an arbitral award under section 34 of… [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm
Eisha Jain argued that the logic built into immigration law, in stated service of immigration control, legitimizes unjustified domestic policing and surveillance, eroding the civil liberties of immigrants. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:09 am
State of U.P (2004)(upholding the ban on the sale of eggs in Rishikesh in addition to the alreadyexisting ban on the sale of meat and fish) and Hinsa VirodhakSangh v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:57 am
See Yerian v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
” Thanks to V&E summer associate Varun Jain and Eric White for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
