Search for: "State v. Jihad"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:38 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Walker v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 2:01 pm
Here's an interesting development in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm
In a case titled United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, 264 U.S. 146 (1924). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:10 pm
From Kamdem-Ouaffo, PhD v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
The prosecution has alleged that Omar's tapes, the linchpin of its case, lay out the details of a conspiracy by five foreign-born Muslims to launch a jihad-inspired attack on the South Jersey military base. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
Supreme Court: “fighting words,” in Chaplinky v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Salahi v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
No dice as to the States, said the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 1:21 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 6:48 am
He suggested that Clapper v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:54 am
Ali Malik: “He just wanted to talk about [jihad] the whole time. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
§ 17C-15-18(a)(1); State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative,… [read post]
