Search for: "State v. Juarez" Results 41 - 60 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court endorsed such a test in a case called Boumediene v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:10 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Civil case arising out of a shooting by a border patrol agent across the border from El Paso, Texas into Juarez, Chihuahua. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
When the adjuster asked if she had driven it thirty times to Juarez in the month, Ms Rangel stated, "No, approximately 20 times per month ... [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
Meanwhile, in reliance on an NICB report, the American Consulate in Juarez requested that the Escalade be returned to the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:02 am by Beck, et al.
"  747 N.E.2d at 763 (characterizing the holding of Juarez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
While the CCRB had a prior practice of referring such matters to the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau, that prior practice does not render the CCRB's current interpretation arbitrary, especially where the CCRB has set forth a rational basis for changing its approach (see Matter of Juarez v New York State Off. of Victim [*3]Servs., 36 NY3d 485,496 [2021]; Matter of Mount Bldrs., LLC v Perlmutter, 200 AD3d 616, 616 [1st Dept 2021] lv denied 38… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
While the CCRB had a prior practice of referring such matters to the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau, that prior practice does not render the CCRB's current interpretation arbitrary, especially where the CCRB has set forth a rational basis for changing its approach (see Matter of Juarez v New York State Off. of Victim [*3]Servs., 36 NY3d 485,496 [2021]; Matter of Mount Bldrs., LLC v Perlmutter, 200 AD3d 616, 616 [1st Dept 2021] lv denied 38… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:28 am by WSLL
The State contends that the district court erred in ruling that Juarez was not required to signal his merge from an entrance ramp onto an interstate highway.Issues: Whether the district court erred in holding that Wyo. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
Electrospace Systems, Inc. 9 F.3d 401, 404 (5th Cir. 1993) (prompt investigation completed within one week); Juarez v. [read post]