Search for: "State v. Judith Law"
Results 41 - 60
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(And yes, I am aware of similarities to Judith Jarvis Thompson’s violinist.) [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
District Court Judge Judith Gibson says they first problem is that “vulgar abuse is not defamatory,” so the proposed new defamation scheme that requires social media platforms to hand over the identity of anonymous commenters to potential defamation claimants is fundamentally flawed. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 2:56 pm
(See, e.g., Cross v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing… [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:37 am
This is the third post on equity in the United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
KF8215.75 .R69 2018 Royster, Judith V. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:30 pm
[1]United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Consider, too, that the app for the conservative-focused Twitter competitor Parler was removed by Apple and Google from their app stores, and blocked by its hosting company, Amazon Web Services, because of concerns that some of Parler's users were encouraging violence.[62] Parler was merely refusing to forbid certain speech, much of which is constitutionally protected—thus voluntarily acting in a way close to how the post office and phone companies are required by law to act.[63]… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
More specifically its aim is to examine the challenges to the current state of law and practice respecting the liability of governments for the obligations of their state owned enterprises (SOEs).[4]That object, once legal marginalia or the creature of “socialist” law studies, has become an increasingly important element in the battles for the control and rationalization of global production chains--and with that control and… [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:10 am
Yet no State has standing? [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:01 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm
Judith Resnik has suggested for some years that "American federalism" ought to be recognized as consisting of three levels--nation, states, and Native American tribes. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
Khan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:06 am
Torrez 1977-78: Judith E. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:11 am
Companies receive a remarkable mix of requests – from those identifying serious and urgent problems, to those attempting to game the Notice and Takedown system as a means to silence speech they disagree with, to those stating wildly imaginative claims under nonexistent laws. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, in Winston v. [read post]
