Search for: "State v. Jump"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
” With regard to plaintiff’s account stated claim, defendant asserted, without corroboration, that she had objected to the invoices at various points, but those “self-serving, bald allegations of oral protests were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated” (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]; accord Schlenker v Cascino, 124 AD3d at 1153). [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:08 pm
HIF Bio, Inc. (07-1437) — filings for which are available after the jump. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:45 am
The Second Circuit just agreed with the Ninth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:45 am
The Second Circuit just agreed with the Ninth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
The fate of the case, Al Janko v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
” Iskanian v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:22 am
Admit it -- from the title of this post you were expecting the usual cliched shot of jumping kangaroos ... [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:37 am
Locomotively questionable train analogies and a bench skeptical of the petitioner’s position marked Tuesday’s argument in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Weiss & Assocs v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:05 am
The Court called for the view of the Solicitor General in United States in Iraq v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:41 pm
It may be accepted under certain circumstances [See State of Haryana v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
As the state's Fourth District Court of Appeal explains in Berry v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:54 am
The workers’ compensation insurance carrier denied the claim, feeling this case was very similar to that of Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am
United States, Schwab v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:12 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 6:24 am
., YINC DA 18-0221 2018MT 311N Civil – Dependent Neglect State v. [read post]
