Search for: "State v. K. B. G." Results 41 - 60 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2010, 9:58 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from SHERYL DENICOLA, n/k/a SHERYL HYER V. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
  This differential concept was first popularized by the Judge Learned Hand decision in Metallizing Eng’g Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Wong v Yeung-Ha  2020 NY Slip Op 31832(U)  June 11, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 505276/18,   Judge: Karen B. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Balkinization has been running a symposium on Christian G. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:18 am
Our beloved United States Supreme Court (aka SCOTUS) kicked off the new season last week (okay, technically they entered a few orders before that). [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
A court would likely conclude that Model Rule 8.4(g) infringes upon the free speech rights of members of the State Bar. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
As of 2021, the tax is no longer levied.[10] 2021 State Income Tax Rates and Brackets State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2021   Single Filer Married Filing Jointly Standard Deduction Personal Exemption State Rates   Brackets Rates   Brackets Single Couple Single Couple Dependent Alabama (a, b, c) 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,500 $7,500 $1,500 $3,000 $1,000   4.00% > $500 4.00% > $1,000        … [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
With this Court declaring clauses 4(k) and (l) of the policy and bye-laws 17(b), and 17A to be unconstitutional, there is no power in the MCD, much less the Delhi Police, to seize and either sell in auction or destroy a rickshaw even where it is found to be driven without a licence or by a person not having a proper licence. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As the present disclaimers have the purpose of restoring novelty over D4b, it is necessary in view of the criteria developed in decision G 1/03 for allowability of disclaimers introduced to restore novelty to determine whether D4b published between the priority date claimed and the filing date represents state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or a disclosure pursuant to A 54(2). [6] In the context of assessing whether D4b is state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or A 54(2),… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U    Division A — Greco   2nd   20   B, F, P    Division B — Myers   1st Floor   12   D, M, N, X, Y    Division C — Farr   2nd   24   C, K, R    Division D — Lefler   2nd   23   H, L, W    Division E — Taylor   2nd   … [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Agent G states in the Criminal Complaint that he reviewed a letter sent to A at her home, postmarked 20 October 2008, which stated in part: “I remember our past experiences together so fondly. [read post]