Search for: "State v. Kay"
Results 41 - 60
of 573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm
Probative Value v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:07 am
See, e.g., Hasty v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:09 am
Mike Kay since he spent almost 12 hours waiting there on November 8, unfortunately in vain, for an opportunity to testify in a Qualcomm v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:30 am
In Mary Kay v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 4:57 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:49 pm
Alabama Governor Kay Ivy signed the act in May, banning nearly all abortions in the state except for pregnancies that threaten the mother’s life. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:11 am
Here is the abstract: In R v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 pm
Gilmer and Jennifer Kay of Bloomberg Law report that “Supreme Court Hands Win to Georgia in State Water War. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 2:56 am
Per Daugomah v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
Murphy, decided Wednesday by Judge Greg Kays (W.D. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:41 am
AffirmedCase Name: ZYGMUNT JOHN SAMIEC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:54 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Howard v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
Suffolk County police officer Gary Salino was served with the summons and complaint in a Federal action [Corey Kay and Winfield Properties, Ltd. v County of Suffolk et al, Civil Action No. 00-1161] in both his personal and his official capacities. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
A Louisiana state court has ruled in Stone Street Capital v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
A Louisiana state court has ruled in Stone Street Capital v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:42 am
Elmowitz v McCormick Dunne & Foley, 30 Misc 3d 1209 (A) (Supreme Court New York County 2010), citing Jacobs v Kay, 50 AD3d 526, 527 (1 Dept. 2008); Costalas v Amalfitano, 305 AD2d 202 203-204 (1 st Dept. 2003). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
