Search for: "State v. L. B. T." Results 41 - 60 of 3,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
State of Indiana, a 5-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Dickson writes:The defendant, William T. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:18 am by Jon L. Gelman
 Federal preemption of state medical fee schedules and regulations are a prevailing challenge to the patchwork of non-uniform state benefit programs.EagleMed, LLC v. [read post]