Search for: "State v. LIGHT-ROTH"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am
Charles Roth is the Director of Litigation at the National Immigrant Justice Center. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 11:18 am
In AgustaWestland North America v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
App.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Petitioner's reply Title: Roth v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:56 pm
[xv] See Footnote v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:14 pm
The new ruling, United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
Henry, in which Kavanaugh joined Garland and Judge Karen Henderson in the reversal of a defendant’s sentence in light of the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Consider the following five examples: “When to Lose a Case and Win a Cause” (discussing Justice William Brennan’s Janus-like obscenity opinion in Roth v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm
Last month, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:05 pm
The facts are based upon a famous ethics case—Zimmerman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
Sixth Circuit: The suit should have been brought in state court. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:33 pm
See her summary on the opinion in Bradley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Kohler, Special Rules for State-owned Companies in European Civil Procedure? [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:44 pm
S. 105, 127 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment)–including obscenity, Roth v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
In light of this guidance, 401(k) sponsors, including those sponsoring 401(k) safe harbor plans, should ensure that their plans are timely amended to comply with the post-Windsor rules. [read post]
