Search for: "State v. Leathers"
Results 41 - 60
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2007, 4:18 pm
On June 28, 2007, a 5-4 Supreme Court ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:18 pm
On June 28, 2007, a 5-4 Supreme Court ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Helms v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
DOJ Antitrust Division Head Christine Varney Offers Guidance on Leegin and Proposes "Structured Rule of Reason Test" For Evaluating RPM Under State Laws When the Supreme Court modified the prohibition against resale price maintenance agreements ("RPM") more than two years ago in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Lots of vinyl and some leather contains lead. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 4:48 pm
States that have killed inmates since the Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
On March 5, 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed to constitute an en banc panel to reconsider a decision issued by the court in Trek Leather Inc. et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:20 pm
Gutmann Leather, LLC, GRE, LLC, et al., No. 2014 IL App (1st) 122460-U. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
Friis requested the dismissal of the appeal and OHIM cross-appealed on two grounds: (i) failure to state reasons in relation to the ‘nutcrackers in precious metals, their alloys or coated therewith, candlesticks in precious metals’ and ‘leather and imitations of leather’ and (ii) contradictory reasoning as regards the other goods in respect of which the Board of Appeal's decision was annulled.The CJEU dismissed both the appeal and the… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
Or on leather seats? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:44 pm
Or is it the acoustics of a wood bat striking a leather-wrapped baseball? [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
Certain state antitrust schemes, for example, continue to treat resale price maintenance (RPM) as per se illegal (see, for example, here), a position inconsistent with the federal consumer welfare-centric rule of reason approach (see Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
Blackhawk Leather, LLC, 313 Wis. 2d 803, 758 N.W.2d 167 (2008). [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Cohen V. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
Marshall was the author of one of the Court’s best-known opinions, tMarbury v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:47 am
See Robinson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
On September 16, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit published its long-awaited decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm
As you might recall, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
The case is Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
