Search for: "State v. Legrande"
Results 41 - 60
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Ceres Gulf, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Griffin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:28 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
As stated by the U. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Leigh v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
” Langfitt v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
Recent posts include a summary of Exxon Mobil Corporation v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
[Fear] v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Id.; see also Hensley v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
In Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s case Oracle v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:15 am
Seachris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Venable v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Sickle v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
King v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Crocker v. [read post]
