Search for: "State v. Levy"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
To do so they attempt to distinguish Miami Herald v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Then, in Liapes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:53 pm
” Under decisions in Nollan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm
He urged the state court to apply a test outlined by the Supreme Court in two property rights cases, Nollan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 7:35 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:15 am
Israeli government spokesman Eylon Levy furiously stated, “The State of Israel will appear before the International Court of Justice at The Hague to dispel South Africa’s absurd blood libel,” equating the application with antisemitic slander against Jews. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
From Levy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
U.S. support and advice to Israel has recently focused on limiting civilian deaths, and yesterday, Israeli government spokesperson Eylon Levy said, “we are going to continue with our campaign to destroy Hamas, a campaign that the United States sees eye to eye with us about. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
V. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
+ come(v.). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:34 am
”) In Pollock v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
[ii] Ueland v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Levy,*Melissa A. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 10:53 am
Texas (Jan. 16) — Whether property owners can seek compensation under the Constitution for “taking” of their property by the state, if the state has not specifically given them a right to sue. [read post]
