Search for: "State v. Liberty" Results 41 - 60 of 10,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Each year in December, I attempt to pick the most important church-state and religious liberty developments of the past year. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Howard Bashman
“The Twisted Career of the term ‘Liberty Interest’ Gets Twistier Still in Dep’t of State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Here are my nominations for the 2010 Top Ten Church-State and Religious Liberty Developments. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
LaFleur (decided the year after Roe) and Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:50 pm
Michael Anthony Lawrence (Michigan State University College of Law) has posted Government as Liberty's Servant: The 'Reasonable Time, Place & Manner' Standard of Review for All Government Restrictions on Liberty Interests on SSRN. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm by Stephen Honig
  The ACLU national staff of 100 lawyers in New York and about 200 in other states are handling about 1400 pending cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
Thanks to the Bill of Rights’ guarantees of certain civil liberties, we’re also protected from egregious abuse of power by authority figures…right? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Renee Hutchins
I appreciate the chance to engage with CoOp readers on the United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
This is not surprising, as the broader societal valence of religious-liberty conflicts has not abated, and many of the major precedents in the field (such as Lemon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Section 35 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State for Justice power to block the release on licence of prisoners sentenced between 1991 and 2003 to prison terms of more than 15 years, was not compatible with article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, providing that anyone deprived of his liberty had the right to have the lawfulness of his detention… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]