Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 41 - 60 of 28,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
Specifically, they highlighted the lines: “I’m in the VIP and I got that pistol on my hip, you prayin’ that you live, I’m prayin’ that I hit, hey, this that slime shit. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
Specifically, they highlighted the lines: “I’m in the VIP and I got that pistol on my hip, you prayin’ that you live, I’m prayin’ that I hit, hey, this that slime shit. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
Specifically, they highlighted the lines: “I’m in the VIP and I got that pistol on my hip, you prayin’ that you live, I’m prayin’ that I hit, hey, this that slime shit. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by SCOTUSblog
ShareWe live blogged as the court released three opinions in argued cases from the current term. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:49 pm by Donald Dinnie
MEC for the Department of Health Free State Province v G.A.K obo M.A.K (2795/2015) [2024] ZAFSHC 142 (25 April 2024) (saflii.org) [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
On the state level, only some Medicaid programs in the U.S. cover these visits. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am by Melissa Stewart
UNCLOS is considered a “living treaty” with flexible rules of interpretation that can be read with reference to the text of the instrument itself in addition to other relevant “external rules” of international law, as confirmed by the Tribunal in the advisory opinion (paras. 130-131). [read post]