Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 41 - 60
of 51,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 5:10 am
This court will also apply that long-standing case law, and the court will therefore in particular apply the so-called “gold standard” disclosure test in this context, which is also the standard used in many Contracting Member States of the UPC. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am
— Dylan GibbsTODAY'S DOCKETSCC says Charter applies to school boards, and correctness applies to Charter issuesShiny new greenwashing rulesPlus, encampments, forever chemicals, no-fly lists, and taxi drivers vs. the gig economySCCNow that’s a Charter schoolYork Region District School Board v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
However, in its Judgment No. 86/2024 of 17 May 2024, the ADCFC took the opposite position by considering that the Civil Marriage Law applies “even if one or both parties are Muslims” as long as “the parties belong to a country that does not primarily apply Islamic Sharia in personal status”. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:31 pm
United States, Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch would have maintained the stay. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:25 pm
A good faith disagreement exists between the majority in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:57 pm
" Kavanaugh wrote: Members of this Court have long held that, "'[a]nytime a State is enjoined by a court from effectuating statutes enacted by representatives of its people, it suffers a form of irreparable injury.'" Maryland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:15 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
" Gross v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm
In March, in Lindke v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:29 am
Delman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am
Both the immediate stakes and the lineup in Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
" As Alito notes, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:43 am
From an originalist perspective, NLRB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
I have chosen these three because they reflect broader patterns in Trump’s agenda: each would be enormously consequential, directly attacking at least several hundred thousand long-time residents of the United States; each would exploit pre-existing weaknesses in the immigration enforcement regime that render it susceptible to actors interested in undermining the rule of law; and each would sow fear throughout immigrant communities, even if it does not “succeed”… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
[FN1] In sum, because the employment agreements appear to have given petitioner a "free hand in determining when and for how long [he] would work" (Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269), the Comptroller's determination excluding petitioner's overtime payments from his final average salary is reasonable, supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d at 745; Matter of Mowry v… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
[FN1] In sum, because the employment agreements appear to have given petitioner a "free hand in determining when and for how long [he] would work" (Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269), the Comptroller's determination excluding petitioner's overtime payments from his final average salary is reasonable, supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d at 745; Matter of Mowry v… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:23 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Kavanaugh is quoting Justice Kennedy's concurrence in the judgment in Simon & Schuster v. [read post]
