Search for: "State v. MacOmber" Results 41 - 60 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2019, 8:26 am by Matthew Benedict
 A copy of the Michigan case, Smith v Macomb County Concealed Weapons Board, No 323696  2016 is available here. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Albrecht, which raises questions about whether a state-law failure-to-warn claim is pre-empted by federal law regulating the safety and efficacy of prescription drugs, and Obduskey v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Stephen Macomber, No. 113,869 (Shawnee)Direct appeal (petition for review); Involuntary manslaughterJonathan B. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:58 am by Peter Mahler
In his suit, Gourary’s son essentially claimed that Laster, Macomber, and Green together schemed to take advantage of Gourary’s failing health and mental state by deceiving him into selling his 50% interest at a price far below its value, and that in furtherance of the scheme Macomber obtained a “biased” low-ball, $12.3 million appraisal of the Chelsea building when they knew it was worth several times that in what was… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:02 am by Daniel Shaviro
There is of course whatever remains, as constitutional law, of Eisner v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See, e:g., Laub v Faessel, 297 A.D.2d 28, 31 (1st Dep’t 2002) (stating that for breach of fiduciary, “plaintiff must establish that the alleged misrepresentations or other misconduct were the direct and proximate cause of the losses claim”); Pokoik v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:01 am by Liisa Speaker
   The United States Supreme Court has denied an appeal in the case of two Macomb County deputies who were sued for civil rights violations when making an arrest. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Vigilance from the bench relative to the collection of fines is one thing; but incarceration of a defendant that lacks any ability to pay constitutes a debtor's prison.Incarceration for the inability to pay fines and costs was proscribed by the United States Supreme Court in the 1983 case of Bearden v Georgia. [read post]