Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 41 - 60
of 19,767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2012, 6:41 am
One of the issues was whether the appearance of the trade-mark on a website viewable in Canada that originated from the United States was "use" of that trade-mark in Canada. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 1:28 am
Kapur v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Chancery Division “The exclusion within section 1(2)(c) of the Patents Act 1977 stating that schemes rules and methods for performing mental acts were not to be regarded as inventions should be construed narrowly. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
it may — depending on the specific mark which is described as enjoying a reputation and, accordingly, on the public concerned — be sufficient that a Community trade mark enjoys a reputation in one Member State, which does not need to be the State in which that provision is relied upon. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
The Race to the Bottom will be covering the SEC charges against Mark Cuban, the billionaire entrepreneur. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm
Mark Killenbeck, author of several excellent legal histories, including one on M’Culloch v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:08 pm
In Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:10 pm
Criminal procedure — Habeas corpus petition — Sentencing by state for federal offense In this case, Mark Lomax, appellant, appeals from the denial of a petition for habeas corpus he filed in the Circuit Court for Allegany County. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:49 am
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:07 am
STATE OF MARYLAND appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:05 am
United States: 23 For Government, 1 For Taxpayer: Reply Brief For Petitioners, Moore v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:51 pm
In FLFMC LLC v Wham-O, the complaint states that the FRISBEE flying disc is marked with U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:05 am
In Kaite v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:02 pm
Judge Robinson stated in Brinkmeier v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
To be a pattern mark: EUIPO v. [read post]