Search for: "State v. Mark T." Results 41 - 60 of 11,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Most workers usually don’t know what they’re getting involved in. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
Jarrells didn’t breach any fiduciary duty to Applied, and Bruin didn’t interfere with any contract between Jarrells and Applied. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
Mark Esper, Trump’s former defense secretary, has warned of “more … hyper-aggressive behavior” by Trump if he takes office, recounting when Trump asked if demonstrators gathering around the White House following the death of George Floyd could be shot. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 1:52 am by Yosi Yahoudai
It marks the first time the Supreme Court has considered a state ban since Roe was reversed. [read post]