Search for: "State v. Marshall"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,478
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2024, 6:16 am
Article V states that an amendment must either be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm
”[4] Limited to two ladies per sitting, guests could dine amidst the extravagant atmosphere.[5] Catherine Marshall, from the Sydney Morning Herald, reports she was served a twelve-course meal designed by MONA’s head chef, Vince Trim, in a dining area adorned with a Carrara marble table and Italian velvet chairs.[6] Here, women were both observers and observed while enjoying their meal, reflecting MONA’s approach to social commentary with this exhibit. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Even more important for Wirt was the current American state of mind, a so [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
In Patchak v. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 8:49 am
” Marshall v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Prince rejects fair use when his stated intent was to have fun. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Hasen, Election Meltdown: Dirty Tricks, Distrust, and the Threat to American Democracy (Yale University Press, 2020).2019December 14, 2019Balkinization Symposium on Mary Anne Franks, The Cult of the Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2019).December 6, 2019Balkinization Symposium on David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 8:16 am
Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 404 (1821) (Marshall, C. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” Pace William Riker—who (in)famously argued that, “if in the United States one disapproves of racism, one should disapprove of federalism”—LaCroix reveals how state power was wielded in service of abolition and Black freedom. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” (p. 60) Martin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
During the first week of constitutional law as conventionally taught in most American law schools (and as I teach it), students learn that, in the words of Chief Justice John Marshall speaking for the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:44 am
” And in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Ogden, Brown v Maryland, Willson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Ogden to Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
United States, constitutes a warp-speed shift to a new constitutional universe. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
Trust as reliance and faith in character, and the expectations that this produced, were deeply embedded in the law of corporations as it developed in the United States (one notes, however, a generalized convergence of notions of director duties in European and Chinese systems; e.g., Gerner-Beuerle & Schuster, 2014, 199 (Europe); Xu et al. [read post]