Search for: "State v. Martin"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
While states’ rights often involved slavery and white supremacy, states’ rights and state sovereignty were also invoked to defend the rights of northern citizens to resist efforts to enforce the Fugitive Slave laws. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Martin, Devisee of Fairfax (which produced the decision reversed in Martin v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Martin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
The Court applies the famous ruling in Tinker v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:15 pm
Until recently, local policies on homelessness have been guided by two controversial rulings from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Martin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
David V. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm
Attorney or Special Counsel is almost surely at most an "inferior officer," as the Supreme Court held with respect to the Independent Counsel in 1988 in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
Jeremy Delknap, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Rejection of Nixon Precedent The court addressed the government’s reliance on a statement in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Rejection of Nixon Precedent The court addressed the government’s reliance on a statement in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:42 pm
Martin, No. 19-cv-6970 (CS), 2021 WL 3500164, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
I've written two other posts about Grants Pass v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The High Court agreed in R (Harrison) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) that the current lack of provision for legal humanist weddings in England and Wales was in breach of Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
These include: A circuit court decision dealing a new setback to DEI efforts in Fearless Fund; A state court decision exposing potential cracks in U.S. states’ anti-ESG efforts in Keenan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
These include: A circuit court decision dealing a new setback to DEI efforts in Fearless Fund; A state court decision exposing potential cracks in U.S. states’ anti-ESG efforts in Keenan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
These include: A circuit court decision dealing a new setback to DEI efforts in Fearless Fund; A state court decision exposing potential cracks in U.S. states’ anti-ESG efforts in Keenan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
These include: A circuit court decision dealing a new setback to DEI efforts in Fearless Fund; A state court decision exposing potential cracks in U.S. states’ anti-ESG efforts in Keenan v. [read post]
