Search for: "State v. Michael A. Clements"
Results 41 - 60
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
According to the SEC website, the following are xamples of SEC enforcement actions against Ponzi schemes: 2014 · Neal V. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:20 am
” Six days after Friday’s announcement that the Court will review a challenge to a Texas law imposing additional regulations on abortion clinics in that state, coverage of and commentary on Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:33 am
Creech, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
(Declaration of Michael Baryla ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction (“Baryla Decl. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:49 pm
United States. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Concepcion v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:16 am
To prove an antitrust claim, Justice Kagan stated, one needs economic evidence of monopoly power, antitrust injury and damages. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:52 am
American Express Company v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
Michael Kellogg argued for American Express. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Next month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Ellerman, James Clements and Zeina Smidi, Conrad M. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
Wallace, Jr.PartnerChair, Sports Law GroupThompson Coburn LLPThe conference has a number of distinguished speakers with sports law ties, including Paul Clement, who argued for the NFL in Brady v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Paul Clement leads all advocates in private practice with nine appearances, including appearances in cases such as Perry v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:45 am
Paul Clement and Michael Carvin, who argued for the plaintiffs before the Court, explicitly denied any such desire. [read post]
