Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 41 - 60
of 20,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
In a 2013 paper, Kevin V. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:48 am
Here's the abstract: In Everson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:31 am
Bridge Trustees Ltd v Yates and others (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening) [2011] UKSC 42; [2011] WLR (D) 267 “Equilibrium of assets and liabilities was not a requirement of the definition of a money purchase pension scheme under section 181 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993.” WLR Daily, 27th July 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
Merit Decision: Charter School Director Not Liable for Embezzled Funds. State ex rel. Yost v. Burns.
10 May 2022, 4:31 am
Yost v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 3:31 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down three decisions Monday, including United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:38 pm
See US v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:12 am
United States, follows an earlier decision striking down DOMA in the First Circuit, Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:33 pm
[v] Id. at 4. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
See Cone v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 9:18 am
United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
R (Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 137 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 24 ”When deciding whether to make an award of damages, under art 5(5) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for a breach of art 5(4) of the Convention it was necessary to have regard to the provisions of s 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the restrictions placed on such awards. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
For my money, the most interesting is Yates v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 8:35 pm
A judge in Florida v Espinoza recently stated the following in regards to a police sting involving Bitcoin: Nothing in our frame of references allows us to accurately define or describe Bitcoin… Bitcoin may have some attributes in common with what we commonly refer to as money, but differ in many important aspects. [read post]
