Search for: "State v. Noe"
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am
Communities for a Better Environment, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:30 pm
The 2009 Supreme Court decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:22 pm
” Twenty years later, in Whitman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:37 am
See, e.g., Noe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
The filing of a facially-valid Notice of Exemption (NOE) triggers a 35-day statute of limitations (Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Such are the fundamental philosophical lessons of the Sixth District Court of Appeal’s recently published opinion in Save Our Big Trees v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Albert Thomas Paulek v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:33 am
Brand West Dairy and Maria Angelica Aguirre v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
CREED-21 v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
Ventura Foothill Neighbors v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
In Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm
Citizens For Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
City of Visalia (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 408 [don’t prematurely file your NOE or NOD if you want it to effectively trigger the shortest limitations period]; San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm
In May v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
See Town Versus Gown Fight Continues Over State University EIR. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:57 am
Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
