Search for: "State v. Otto" Results 41 - 60 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2011, 3:00 am by Greg Mersol
 It found that permitting a state law overtime class action to proceed while FLSA claims were pending, even if in a different case, would "eviscerate the purpose of Section 216(b)'s opt-in requirement," citing Otto v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:37 am by On the Net
Here is the text of Arizona Governor Jan Brewer’s October 13, 2010, press release about the brief she filed on behalf of Arizona in the United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
ICYMI: Recent assessments of the Supreme Court's attempt to distinguish Korematsu from Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 11:35 am by Tobias Thienel
As Otto recalls in his post, the Court of Appeal accepted on the law that an act could be attributed both to the sending state and to the UN. [read post]