Search for: "State v. Owings"
Results 41 - 60
of 9,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 10:17 am
The AES Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:48 am
Additional Resources:First Data Merchant Services LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 3:13 pm
Akerman, [1891] 3 Ch. 212, Kekewich J. stated: A person who owes an estate money, that is to say, who is bound to increase the general mass of the estate by contribution of his own, cannot claim an aliquot share given to him out of that mass without first making the contribution which completes it. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 5:40 am
The case is entitled Peak v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm
Like Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:05 am
These allegations adequately stated a claim for breach of the duty of loyalty against those defendants the court said, since the plaintiff also adequately alleged that the defendants owed fiduciary duties to RCAP. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
All the way back in 1999, the trial court approved the parties’ agreed order establishing paternity, awarding custody to Mother, ordering Father to pay Child’s birth expenses and medical insurance, and stating that the parties agreed no additional child support should be owed. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:45 am
In a holding that is sure to be quoted in future cases, the court stated “In my opinion advertisers on the web owe a duty to ensure that their representations are true and not misleading. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:30 am
Campbell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:17 pm
Held: A debtor that owes additional Maryland State taxes after a federal determination of additional income cannot discharge such debt in bankruptcy if it did not report the federal determination to the State. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
If You Own Land in the Lone Star State, You Also Own the Water Down Below, Texas Supreme Court Rules
25 Feb 2012, 4:42 pm
The Court ruled, 9-0, that limiting landowners' right to use ground-water amounted to a "taking", for which the state owed compensation. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:12 am
There will sometimes be privity between the estate and the will-writing attorney, and at other times, none, see, Jacobs v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am
Porsche A.G. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:01 pm
The Supremes say they aren't owed any additional compensation. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:12 am
As I understood State Farm's appellate brief in Tuepker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am
R (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1; [2010] WLR (D) 4 “Where an individual was subject to two or more sets of proceedings, or phases of a single proceeding, and a civil right or obligation enjoyed or owed by him would be determined in one of them, he could (but not necessarily would), by force of art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, enjoy… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:09 am
Reis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
