Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 41 - 60 of 6,731
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the evidence adduced by… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[56] Among survivors, at least 5 percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[57] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Far more interesting has been the effects within the domains of Latin American politics, especially among the CELAC states (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) including Cuba--the competitor organization to the OAS (Organization of American States) including the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
Both the company and claimant were resident in Singapore and thus gateway (p) was satisfied. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In short, the Court held that “[p]ure omissions are not actionable under Rule 10b–5(b). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:19 am by Ronald Mann
” Accordingly, she concludes, “[p]ure omissions are not actionable under Rule 10b-5(b). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am by Unknown
P. alleged that Macquarie and various officer defendants had violated Section §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b–5. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The authors presented an adjusted OR of 15.58, with a p-value of 0.02. [read post]