Search for: "State v. P. S." Results 41 - 60 of 20,852
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, plaintiff fails to plead facts stating a claim for both “fraud on the court” and under Judiciary Law§ 487. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
And he wrote an excellent concurrence (page 25) explaining why:COPYRIGHTPaywall schmaywallBlacklock's Reporter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
To determine whether an utterance constituted a criminal threat, the case of R v McCraw, 1991 CanLII 49 (SCC) indicated that this determination is a question of law the court further stated, at p.88, that the words: “Must be looked at in the context in which they were spoken or written, in light of the person to whom they were addressed and the circumstances in which they were uttered. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
It’s a little fuzzy exactly what Google allegedly did wrong, but it appears the plaintiff is complaining that the state defamed the plaintiff and the states allegations were picked up in Google’s search engine and in video uploaded to YouTube. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]