Search for: "State v. Patten"
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am
Earlier this week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
Patten LJ (who gave the lead judgment) stated that where a company makes a claim for losses suffered by it as a result of the conduct of a fraudulent director, it does not matter if the company was the intended primary or secondary victim of the fraud. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
Patten LJ agreeing with Rimer LJ said this: “160. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:48 pm
Van Patten, 128 S. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:50 am
” The hearing focused on the FTC’s ability to obtain equitable monetary relief under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act – an issue that is currently being considered by the Supreme Court in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm
Patten: Judge Learned Hand, First Amendment ProphetJames WeinsteinChapter 4The Story of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:26 am
The court, in an unpublished opinion, relied on Van Patten v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, with Lord Justice Floyd setting out the reasons with which Lord Justices Flaux and Patten agreed. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
by its mRNA (the encoding gene) in T-cell and B-cell lymphomas, and (v) the information that Neutrokine-? [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
Wisconsin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 5:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Mr Justice Arnold is on a bit of a winning streak it seems, as last week in Idenix v Gilead [2016] EWCA 1089 the Court of Appeal consisting of Lord Justices Kitchin (giving the lead judgment), Floyd and Patten upheld his decision back in December 2014 (see Kat Darren's post here). [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Van Patten Issue: Whether, in light of the Court’s decision in Carey v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:08 pm
The recent case of State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:35 pm
– Remarks on the Protection of Crime Victims in the Light of the Guarantees in the European Convention on Human Rights Audrey Patten, “Empty Human Rights Lip Service”: France’s Roma Expulsions and the Failure of the European Union to Exercise its Racial Equality Directive Beata Faracik, The Role of the State in Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Human Rights and Business with Special Consideration of Poland [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 9:18 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 6:57 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:28 am
In GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
Litzinger then called the First Assistant United States Attorney for North Dakota, who said that the VHS tapes were within the scope of the warrant. [read post]
